Discover

Eligibility you can defend, not a relevance score

The problem
A list of opportunities ranked by keyword similarity is a list somebody still has to read. The useful question is narrower and harder: which of these are we actually eligible for, and what would we have to be true to qualify?
What the system contributes
It reads the sources, extracts what they require, and keeps every derived figure attached to the record it came from — so a number can be checked rather than trusted.
What a person decides
Every consequential act here is a named human decision, bound to the exact version it was made against. The system prepares it; it never takes it.

How discovery works here

Source connectors
In progress
Funding sources are connected under recorded terms. A source whose terms have not been accepted does not silently start ingesting.
Opportunity versions
Built
An opportunity that changes becomes a new version rather than an edited row, so a decision made last week still points at what it was made against.
Eligibility criteria
Built
Criteria are recorded per pursuit with a verdict, whether they block, and the evidence behind them. An unmet blocking criterion stops a go decision rather than lowering a score.
Deterministic matching
In progress
Fit assessment against your organisation profile, with the rule that produced each judgement recorded alongside it.